tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9963485.post5928653196405975995..comments2024-02-12T12:52:03.999+01:00Comments on Robert Milkowski's blog: Is it really a random load?milekhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13649951503953000496noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9963485.post-48464522089072743062009-05-15T17:12:00.000+02:002009-05-15T17:12:00.000+02:00ok, I maybe oversimplified here.
Knowing the works...ok, I maybe oversimplified here.<br />Knowing the workset size and the fact that distribution is even among it every 1s you know that at least it is not sequential (as you can't read that much data in 1s in my config). Then by providing more granular output you can be even more sure. Now it is not of course the smoking gun for real randomness but I didn't need it here.milekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13649951503953000496noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9963485.post-16811943141286144672009-05-15T16:19:00.000+02:002009-05-15T16:19:00.000+02:00I don't see how you can determine from this whethe...I don't see how you can determine from this whether or not the load is random. The number of accesses in each interval are roughly the same but you provide no information as to whether or not data was accessed in a random order.Rand Huntzingernoreply@blogger.com